Sunday, November 11, 2012




In 1936 American political scientist Harold Dwight Lasswell defined politics as "who gets what, when, how." As this definition implies, politics is a debate over the distribution of resources, including natural resources, goods, wealth and land. Disagreements over the distribution of resources are at the root of political conflict.

Levels of Conflict
Conflict doesn't always mean war or violence. All political disagreements are conflicts, and without conflict there would be no need for elections or debate. If politics is "who gets what, when and how," the goal of political bodies and systems is to manage conflict and attempt to find fair solutions. The government's role is to attempt to resolve political conflicts fairly and peacefully. When solutions cannot be found that are acceptable to the parties involved, conflict can escalate, even to the point of war.
Economics
The relationship between economics and conflict is a complicated one. Civil war is less likely in wealthier countries, and low income and income growth rates make individuals more easy to recruit as rebels. However, violent conflict also requires a certain level of funding, which makes very poor people less likely to become violent unless someone provides the funding for them to acquire weapons. Poor communities can become hubs for narcotics and related activities which also can lead to conflict.
Natural Resources
Natural resources have long been a chief source of conflict between people and between nations. Nations have gone to war over natural resources such as farm land, the rights to waterways and areas rich in commodities like gold and silver. As populations increase and natural resources have depleted, these conflicts have continued. In the future, some believe we will have intense conflicts over commodities such as fuel and water.
Race, Religion and Other
While religion, ethnicity, culture, political affiliation and race may be seen as a cause of conflict, they are typically more of a means of conflict than a source. Differences between groups are frequently exploited by political leaders to create a desire for conflict among populations. The actual goal of the conflict is typically access to resources and has nothing to do with religion, race, or other cultural differences. There are many examples of countries where people of different faiths, races, cultures and political philosophies coexist peacefully.


Related Posts:

  • 6 Reasons to Be Thankful About the Economy Today Falling unemployment, resurgent housing, a resilient euro zone, and more reasons for economic hope this holiday season It's admittedly trite to use the occasion of Thanksgiving to look on the bright side, but given how r… Read More
  • Obama Campaign Polls: How The Internal Data Got It Right President Barack Obama, with his daughter Malia, waves toward the crowd at his reelection night party on Nov. 7, 2012, in Chicago. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast) WASHINGTON -- Summing up the lessons learned from … Read More
  • America's most stressful airports Long check-in lines and distances between gates were the top factors that make airports stressful, according to a new study. A study released last week by KRC Research on behalf of Concur, a provider of travel and expe… Read More
  • Rocket Fire Halts in Gaza Cease-Fire The violence surrounding the Israeli-Hamas conflict claimed 135 lives and wounded hundreds more, including many children. Hamas has intensified rocket strikes against Israel, using munitions that, for the first time, p… Read More
  • Pope Benedict Disputes Jesus’ Date of Birth Pope Benedict XVI holds a copy of his book "Jesus' Childhood" as he meets RCS publisher Paolo Mieli and Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, in the Vatican on Nov. 20, 2012 … Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Viewers

27173

Blog Archive

Popular Posts

Recent Posts